According to this Bloomberg story, the head of the Republican Study Group in the House, a staunch conservative, Rep. Jeb Hensarling, has endorsed using sec. 136 money to provide a bridge loan to the American auto industry – essentially the Voinovich-Levin-Bond bill:
Representative Jeb Hensarling, a Texas Republican, said he is “more than happy” to allow the automakers to use the energy-bill funds to avoid bankruptcy. “If this is such a dire emergency,” he said, the Democrats could waive or delay requirements in the 2007 legislation that the money be used exclusively to develop more fuel-efficient vehicles.
This seemed completely out of character for Rep. Hensarling, so I called his office to clarify his position.
I spoke to Debbee Keller who explained that Rep. Hensarling is in favor of allowing the $25 Billion already passed by Congress to be used to help the Big 3 with their financial issues. The funds were supposed to be for certain purposes, and he agrees that Congress can re-purpose those funds to be used for their operational expenses.
He does not support allocating any of the $700 Billion to the automotive companies. According to Keller, Rep. Hensarling has not taken a position on the Voinovich-Levin-Bond bill.
So you tell me - is this a misrepresentation of Rep. Hensarling's position on the auto bailout?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comments are welcomed so long as they are polite and relate to the topic of the post or further discussion within the comments themselves. Links to articles, blog posts and relevent discussion items are welcomed, but advertisements disguised as comments are not allowed.