Showing posts with label student loans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label student loans. Show all posts

Sunday, June 02, 2013

ICYMI - a round-up of things from across the Internet


A collection of interesting things I came across that I wanted to share.  Th fact that I'm sharing these doesn't mean I agree or disagree with any of it - just that I found it to be an interesting article.

I'll probably do a post like this every weekend throughout the summer, especially when the weather is nice and I'd rather be outside enjoying - or on the lake!

So when you can, click through as you probably won't see these articles or topics in any of the main stream news coverage.  Enjoy!


Yep, now that you've clicked through and seen that, have a great day!

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Student Loan Fairness Act: America - what have you wrought?!?




I'm not a subscriber to MoveOn.org but several friends are and they forwarded me a recent email from Robert Applebaum, a MoveOn member in Staten Island, who created a petition on SignOn.org.

You've never heard of Applebaum? He's the founder of an organization called StudentDebtCrisis.org.

The complete email is below, but here are a couple of excerpts:

Student loan debt now exceeds $1 trillion. Millions are buried under student debt, forced to put off major purchases and life decisions.

Put off major purchases?!? Oh, the humanity!

Let's put this in perspective: students voluntarily took on huge amounts of debt for schooling, choosing to borrow instead of working to pay for their college educations - you know, like of many of used to do.

They then graduate and have to begin paying off that debt. But, because they have financial obligations, they have to make choices and that means they can't go out and purchase a new car or a new TV, or a new anything because they're expected to cover this obligation before taking on others?

Why is that a bad thing? Isn't that called 'life' and part of being an adult?

The good news is that this week, legislation has been reintroduced in Congress that would provide student loan forgiveness to responsible borrowers drowning in debt.

How in the world can you be called a 'responsible borrower' if you are drowning in debt?

Wouldn't the fact that you are "drowning" in so much debt clearly indicate that you weren't very responsible about your borrowing in the first place?!?

The Student Loan Fairness Act would create a new "10-10" standard for student loan repayment, in which an individual would be required to make ten years of payments at 10% of their discretionary income, after which their remaining student loan debt would be forgiven.

So if I pay 10% of my "discretionary" income toward my loan for 10 years, I won't have to pay anything else on it forever?

What a bargain!

And why in the world would any college student, educated in today's schools that teach self-gratification and dependency on government, ever pay more? Why would they make sacrifices of 'major purchases' if they know they can skate by with paying only 10% of their discretionary income?

If all they have to pay is 10%,why pay more? That would be foolish!

And only 10% of their discretionary income?

That means they can spend as much as they want on a house or apartment, food, utilities, etc... They won't be forced to balance their desire for a larger place to live with their ability to pay all their financial obligations. They won't be forced to eat hamburger instead of steak for dinner. They won't be forced to wear sweaters in the winter or go without air conditioning in the summer in order to keep their utility bills lower.

In other words, they won't be forced to make the same decisions adults have always been forced to make, learning to balance their ability to pay with their wants and desires.

Is this really the lesson we want new adults in our (supposedly) productive society to embrace?

"Further, this legislation would...allow those eligible to convert their private loan debt into federal direct loans

Why? Why would we want students who have private loans to convert them to government loans? Would the bank that issued the private loans be paid off with tax dollars? And then the tax payers would never be paid back???

And what about our huge national debt? Won't putting more college students on the government rolls negatively impact the nation's debt?

What about the sequester? According to President Barack Obama, there's not enough money so he had to end tours of the White House - the people's house. We don't have enough money for air traffic controllers - clearly a vital service to the nation and our economy - but we have the funds to add more people to the government student loan program only to allow them to never repay the debt?!?

In what world would this ever make sense?

And yes, this definitely qualifies for 'stuck-on-stupid' designation!

Student loan debt causes an undeniable and significant drag on the economy. The Student Loan Fairness Act directly addresses this enormous boot on the neck of the middle class and represents a glimmer of hope for millions of Americans who, with each passing day, find that the American Dream is more and more out of reach.

It may be true that having to pay student loans causes a drag on the economy. The 'logic' is that having to pay back the money borrowed means the student isn't spending elsewhere, and without that elsewhere spending, the economy suffers.

What is never mentioned is the loss to the economy when the taxpayer, the original supplier of the funds, had to pay extra money to the federal government to provide the funds to be borrowed in the first place.

I had to forgo spending and helping the economy in order to pay taxes that are higher than necessary because of the need to fund this government program.

Now 'they' want to complain that repaying that money will hurt the economy? Providing the money in the first place hurt the economy - where was the concern for the economy then?

In a normal world, a student would get a private loan. Under this process, a bank would accept deposits from people in the community, pool those resources, loan the funds for various purposes, charge an interest rate and collect repayment over time.

The bank would then turn around and pay part of that interest back to the original depositors, who would then have additional funds to spend.

The government action distorts and perverts the normal process of money movement - and this act would corrupt the process even further, if that's actually possible.

So far over 200,000 people have signed the petition supporting the bill

Of course they have! They don't want to be responsible for the meeting the obligations they've incurred.

And why would they? We've grown generations who have been trained to believe that nothing is their fault; they are the victim of some evil entity; government will take care of them so they don't have to take care of themselves.

And this doesn't even get into the choice of majors with so many graduating from college with degrees that won't help them get a job or support themselves.



Nor does it delve into the Orwellian Newspeak (control the language) efforts of naming this horribly unfair and economic perversion the "Student Loan Fairness Act."

Oh, America, what have you wrought?



Here is the complete email:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Robert Applebaum <moveon-help@list.moveon.org>
Date: Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:20 PM
Subject: Support the new Student Loan Forgiveness Act




Below is an email from Robert Applebaum, a MoveOn member in Staten Island, New York, who created a petition on SignOn.org. Robert is also the founder of the organization StudentDebtCrisis.org.

Dear MoveOn member,
Student loan debt now exceeds $1 trillion. Millions are buried under student debt, forced to put off major purchases and life decisions.

In short, student loan debt has become the latest financial crisis in America. If we do absolutely nothing, the entire economy will eventually come crashing down again, just as it did when the housing bubble popped.
The good news is that this week, legislation has been reintroduced in Congress that would provide student loan forgiveness to responsible borrowers drowning in debt. So far over 200,000 people have signed the petition supporting the bill. Will you sign and share it with your friends?
The Student Loan Fairness Act would create a new "10-10" standard for student loan repayment, in which an individual would be required to make ten years of payments at 10% of their discretionary income, after which their remaining student loan debt would be forgiven. Further, this legislation would:
  • ensure low interest rates;
  • allow those eligible to convert their private loan debt into federal direct loans;
  • reward graduates for entering public service professions;
  • provide a lifeline for student borrowers who have fallen on difficult times;
  • encourage delinquent and defaulted borrowers to re-enter repayment;
  • replace the current, ten-year "Standard Repayment Plan" for the full amount of the loan balance with the "10-10" plan as the default repayment option for borrowers entering repayment.
Student loan debt causes an undeniable and significant drag on the economy. The Student Loan Fairness Act directly addresses this enormous boot on the neck of the middle class and represents a glimmer of hope for millions of Americans who, with each passing day, find that the American Dream is more and more out of reach. 
Thanks!
–Robert Applebaum, StudentDebtCrisis.org

This petition was created on SignOn.org, the progressive, nonprofit petition site. SignOn.org is sponsored by MoveOn Civic Action, which is not responsible for the contents of this or other petitions posted on the site. Robert Applebaum, StudentDebtCrisis.org didn't pay us to send this email—we never rent or sell the MoveOn.org list.

Want to support our work? MoveOn Civic Action is entirely funded by our 8 million members—no corporate contributions, no big checks from CEOs. And our tiny staff ensures that small contributions go a long way. Chip in here.


Tuesday, April 03, 2012

ICYMI roundup

Due to some unexpected conflicts yesterday, I did not get a chance to do a blog post, so here is an In Case You Missed It (ICYMI) roundup:

*  Republican members of the Energy and Commerce Committee Responded to the Obama Administration's EPA proposal to kill jobs and eliminate energy supplies:

Republican members pushed back strongly this week against EPA’s new proposed rule regulating greenhouse gases for new coal plants. In a hearing Wednesday with EPA Assistant Administrator Gina McCarthy, Republican members of Subcommittee on Energy and Power blasted the administration's actions to shut down coal-fired power generation in the U.S., arguing that it is yet another example that the president's promise of an 'all of the above' energy strategy rings hollow, putting both jobs and affordable, reliable energy at risk.   Read more...
*  Sunday was April Fool's Day, but this is no joke - and it's gone mostly unreported in the lame street media.  As of April 1, the United States has the highest corporate tax rate in the developed world:  39.2%.  Our companies now have a distinct disadvantage with their foreign competitors.  And in a global economy, the United States is now less attractive to companies looking for a new plant or facility. 

And really, even God only asked for 10%, why should the government take more than a third of all profits?  That's money that would have gone to investors, shareholders, owners and used to spur the economy to produce more - or money that would have gone to additional wages and benefits for workers. 

People who think government deserves more in taxes forget the unseen - the greater amount of economic good the money would have generated if it had stayed in the economy rather than be diverted to government for such things as a teapot museum (which failed, btw) or cowgirl hall of fame.

*  From the 'people-who-live-in-glass-houses' file, President Barack Obama has decided to criticize the Republican budget passed by the U.S. House of Representatives.  However, Obama's own budget failed to get a single vote.  Republicans didn't vote for it, which isn't a surprise.  But no Democrat voted for it either.  And this is the second time he's submitted a budget that couldn't get a single vote.

Furthermore, the Senate, which is required the Constitution to do a budget, hasn't passed one in 1,069 days.  That's just a mere 26 days short of three years!  Dereliction of duty is too kind a term for this kind of failure.  And hypocrisy is too kind a term for what the President is doing, but that's part of the plan:  tear apart what the other guy is doing instead of doing something yourself.

*  On the Trayvon Martin-George Zimmerman case, some deliberate fraud by the news media has come to light.  NBC is investigating itself over a doctored playing of the call Zimmerman made to the police on the night of the shooting.


NBC's "Today" show ran the edited audio of George Zimmerman's phone call to a police dispatcher in which Zimmerman says: "'This guy looks like he's up to no good … he looks black."

But the audio recording in its entirety reveals that Zimmerman did not volunteer the information that Martin was black. Instead, Zimmerman was answering a question from a police dispatcher about the race of the "suspicious person" whom Zimmerman was speaking about.

A transcript of the complete 911 call shows that Zimmerman said, "This guy looks like he's up to no good. Or he's on drugs or something. It's raining and he's just walking around, looking about."

The 911 officer responded saying, "OK, and this guy — is he black, white or Hispanic?"

"He looks black," Zimmerman said.

The abridged conversation between Zimmerman and the dispatcher that NBC ran on March 27 has been blasted by media watchdog groups as misleading.
And then there is ABC News which originally ran a story about video that supposedly showed no injuries to Zimmerman, as he claimed.  But yesterday, after they 'enhanced' the video, they changed their story, saying the video clearly shows the gash the on back of Zimmerman's head.  You'd think, before going forward with a story portraying Zimmerman as lying about his injuries, they would have 'enhanced' the video to be sure.

Now how many people do you think are going to rely solely upon the first stories reported, rather than the actual facts that have now come out?

*   Still think spending by the government isn't the problem and that it needs even more taxes? If Uncle Sam had won the MegaMillions jackpot, he'd be able to pay 1/250th of 1% of the U.S. debt.  Sobering thought, isn't it?

Student loan debt has now exceeded $1 trillion - more than credit card and auto loans.  But there is an alternative:  SoFi - Social Financing

The $1 trillion US student loan market is broken. We are here to offer an innovative approach. We are using the power of social communities to transform the industry. SoFi connects students and alumni through a dedicated lending fund and an original social community. SoFi provides an approach where students, alumni and schools all benefit. Alumni earn a compelling double bottom line return, students receive a lower loan rate than their private or federal options, and both sides benefit from the connections formed. Schools access a new, stable, low cost funding source that doesn't cannibalize giving while building accountability to their students and alumni.

SoFi is ‘where social meets finance.’ And we believe we have produced a better student loan – a true student loan solution.

SoFi was founded by a group of Stanford Graduate School of Business students in 2011. The team's motivation is to transform the financial services landscape using social: SoFi defines social as community-oriented, scalable and where participation is commensurate with value.
Just think - private individuals meeting a market need and all without the involvement of government.

Friday, September 18, 2009

Where does Kaptur really stand on government takeover of student loans?

Yesterday, the House of Representatives voted to pass H.R. 3221, the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2009, which basically takes over all student loans from the private sector, creates a new federal bureaucracy - including a 'green schools czar,' and puts the government in the position of being able to deny loans for students at schools that don't adhere to its wishes.

Oh - and it will cost about $100 billion a year!

The vote on the bill was 253-171, with 4 Democrats voting no and 6 Republicans voting yes. Our representative, Marcy Kaptur, voted with her party in the affirmative.

However ....

Last year, Congress voted on the Ensuring Continued Access to Student Loans Act (ECASLA), approving it by a vote of 388-21, with unanimous Democrat support - including Kaptur.

That bill allowed private sector lending and didn't create a new agency:

"The bill urges the Federal Financing Bank, the Federal Reserve, and other federal-chartered private entities such as the Federal Home Loan Banks to work with the Departments of Treasury and Education to ensure that students and families have access to federal student loans in the 2008-2009 academic year."

Because this bill had such broad support last year, the Republicans in Congress offered an amendment to extend ECASLA through 2014 as a substitute for H.R. 3221. Makes sense, doesn't it? After all, ECASLA had unanimous support from the Democrats - why wouldn't they want to continue something they'd previously supported?

Apparently, something changed - drastically!

The amendment failed 165-265 with 257 Democrats unanimously voting no - including Kaptur.

Why? Why was the private sector the solution last year, but government is the solution this year?

And why did Kaptur vote in favor of the private sector provision last year, but against it this year?

Inquiring minds....

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

ICYMI - another government takeover

In Case You Missed It....

The Wall Street Journal had a very interesting article on the 12th about a government takeover few are noticing. The headline:

The Quietest Trillion
Congratulations. You're about to own $100 billion a year in student loans.

The details:

The Obama plan calls for the U.S. Department of Education to move from its current 20% share of the student-loan origination market to 80% on July 1, 2010, when private lenders will be barred from making government-guaranteed loans. The remaining 20% of the market that is now completely private will likely shrink further as lenders try to comply with regulations Congress created last year. Starting next summer, taxpayers will have to put up roughly $100 billion per year to lend to students.

Why, exactly, would private lenders be barred from making such loans? What is the purpose of eliminating the private market from the equation? Isn't this the same type of 'public option' being promoted in the health care bill? And where, exactly, will the government get $100 billion a year to cover this plan?

According to the article, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has reviewed the numbers and says that the programs will cost a fortune for the government to run and that the savings projected from the takeover are not anywhere near the official budget estimate, also called the 'score.' Despite the CBO assertions that the accounting is bogus, the accounting remains the official 'score' under the budget rules, "even though the official scorekeeper says it is wrong."

So when our representatives talk to us about the impact of this takeover, which numbers do you think they'll use????

The conclusion:

All of this is certain to pass the House, and the only chance for stopping it is in the Senate. If it passes, parents will soon have no choice beyond a Washington bureaucracy to borrow money for their college-bound children, and taxpayers will pay a fortune for the privilege.


I hope you'll read the entire article and then call your representatives and see if they can identify where they'd get the money to cover this additional cost - and you can also ask them how they can support a plan whose Enron-style accounting would land the private sector in jail.
Google Analytics Alternative