Saturday, May 29, 2010

Court:Cincinnati Public Schools violated state law

This in via email from the 1851 Center for Constitutional Law. There was some discussion of this issue in Toledo so I'm sharing the outcome from Cincinnati.

Court: Cincinnati Public Schools Violated State Law

Judge Rules CPS Deed Restrictions Against Charter and Private Schools Illegal

Columbus - Cincinnati Public Schools' (CPS) policy of prohibiting the sale of unused available public school buildings to charter schools and private schools violates state law, yesterday ruled Hamilton County Common Pleas Court Judge Robert P. Ruehlman. The judge issued the ruling immediately from the bench.

The case was won by the 1851 Center for Constitutional Law on behalf of the Theodore Roosevelt School, a Cincinnati charter school CPS sued to block from opening. The school building was unused and located in the Fairmount neighborhood, where all CPS schools are in academic emergency, and 80 percent of families are of minority status, and live in poverty.

CPS attempted to enforce a deed restriction prohibiting charter or private schools from using school buildings previously owned by CPS. The 1851 Center asserted such a restriction is void by Ohio's public policy in favor of school choice, and cheats taxpayers of sales revenue from the buildings. The court agreed.

In his ruling, Judge Ruehlman called CPS's deed restrictions anti-competitive and acknowledged that CPS was merely attempting to suppress competition from charter and other alternative schools, and thwart school choice for the parents and children of Cincinnati.

"The court's decision is a landmark ruling in favor of school choice in Ohio and against adversarial school districts who attempt to block alternative schools' right to exist," said 1851 Center Executive Director Maurice Thompson. "School districts across the state are now on notice that Ohio law clearly and specifically protects the rights of alternative schools. And serious financial penalties could befall districts who attempt to squelch the rights of these schools."

The ruling halts CPS's restrictive practice and opens the district to the loss of hundreds of millions of dollars in funding from the Ohio School Facilities Commission (OSFC). Last week, OSFC member State Rep. Kris Jordan moved to stop state facilities funding to CPS because of its purported violations. Jordan, prompted by the 1851 Center's legal action against CPS, informed the commission the school district forfeited its statutory right to project funding because of repeated violations of state charter schools provisions. The court's ruling bolsters Jordan's assertion. Jordan's letter to the commission is available here.

"Over $46 million in state revenue has been directed away from Cincinnati Public Schools, and to charter schools, as over 7,000 students have left the Cincinnati Public School System for charters," said Thompson. "Deed restrictions like the one struck down were devised to stop new charter and private schools from opening in Cincinnati, so CPS could retain students and state funds."

The court's ruling affirms:

* A contract term that violates public policy is void;
* A contract term that hinders the purpose of a statute is void;
* CPS's deed restriction is void due to Ohio's public policy in favor of transferring taxpayer-owned school buildings to community schools;
* CPS's deed restriction is void because it is in derogation of a statewide public policy in favor of effectuating parental choice and educational opportunity through community schools; and
* Although the deed restriction is void, the conveyance must remain valid.

The 1851 Center's filings in the case are available here and here.

The 1851 Center for Constitutional Law is non-profit, non-partisan legal center dedicated to protecting the constitutional rights of Ohioans from government abuse. The 1851 Center litigates constitutional issues related to property rights, voting rights, regulation, taxation, and search and seizures.


1 comment:

Mad Jack said...

...where all CPS schools are in academic emergency...

You know how bad things have to be before the government will get involved to the extent that a labor union is criticized? Then we have the fact that all schools are in academic emergency. Not a few, but all schools. Shouldn't this be a daily featured news item in, say, The Blade, rather than this panacea of a new county government? Isn't it outrageous enough to make the cut?

These are rhetorical questions, I guess, except for the last one. This means that there are students, many students, who did not learn to read, and the public school system is doing its best to block a solution at the expense of literacy.

Google Analytics Alternative