Sunday, October 17, 2010

Police and Fire Retirees become millionaires?

The following press release was sent by The Buckeye Institute. I know that many of our Toledo Police officers are in the DROP program and I know that Toledo faces the loss of many good officers because participants are required to retire after the set period of time. But the financial impact of participation, as detailed below, surprised me.

October 13, 2010


COLUMBUS - The Buckeye Institute for Public Policy Solutions today released "Dipped in Gold: Upper-Management Police and Fire Retirees become Public-Service Millionaires." Through the Deferred Retirement Option Plan (DROP), public safety officials are eligible to retire on paper, yet continue to work for up to eight years while their pensions (along with three percent cost-of-living allowances and five percent interest payments) accumulate in untouchable accounts. When the officers exit DROP, it is not uncommon for them to collect lump sum payments totaling roughly $1 million dollars. Since they are treated as if they are in year 9 of retirement when they exit DROP, many in upper management also collect yearly pension payments in excess of $100,000 for the rest of their lives.

Since the Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund (OP&F) is a highly secretive entity, the report details DROP payouts and pensions for hypothetical Columbus and Cincinnati police officers. Supposing the average DROP participant is a Columbus police officer, taxpayers would save nearly $1.2 billion if the DROP program were eliminated and the retirement age were raised from 48 to 55. The report also suggests several other money-saving options such as terminating cost-of-living allowance increases during DROP, tying the interest payments to market rates, and disallowing participants to keep their required employee contributions to OP&F.

Mary McCleary, Buckeye Institute Policy Analyst, stated: "Making public servants millionaires when they retire is not the bargain you agreed to as a taxpayer. Ohioans bear the seventh highest state and local tax burden due to expensive programs like DROP. Private-sector taxpayers, many of whom have experienced job losses, pay freezes or cuts, and benefit reductions, cannot afford to finance the gold-plated compensation packages of their police officer and firefighter neighbors."

The report can be viewed on The Wire at



Hooda Thunkit (Dave Zawodny) said...

Regardless of what you or I think about these retirement schemes, they were negotiated and agreed to by both sides, in good faith, and are legal.

If changes are desired/required, they should be made, from this point forward and for all new hires.

What has already been earned, should be paid out as agreed to and as the benefits were earned.

IMNHO, you cannot renegotiate or change the past terms, but you can change what happens during any/all future employment.

This may not be popular, but it is the right thing to do.

Maggie Thurber said...

Hooda - agreed!

Google Analytics Alternative