A horse, a horse! My kingdom for a horse!

I picked the title of this blog post from Shakespeare's Richard the Third because it seemed so appropriate. In the play, Richard is about to meet his doom at the hands of Henry VII and his horse is dead. This line is supposed to be his valiant cry, signifying his determination to continue to fight.

I think today I'd change it to:

An honest man, an honest man! Our nation for an honest man!

This thought came to me as I read today's Patriot Post 'Founder's Quote Daily' from James Madison:

"Whatever may be the judgement pronounced on the competency of the architects of the Constitution, or whatever may be the destiny of the edifice prepared by them, I feel it a duty to express my profound and solemn conviction ... that there never was an assembly of men, charged with a great and arduous trust, who were more pure in their motives, or more exclusively or anxiously devoted to the object committed to them."

I realized that, given similar circumstances today, I don't believe we'd be able to find more than 10 individuals who would be 'pure in their motives' and capable of producing a document like our Constitution.

Our founders were actually ordinary men with ordinary jobs and lives - but they did an extraordinary thing. "Exclusively or anxiously devoted" to the task of giving us a document that would establish a government capable of surviving longer than just about any other, rooted in the idea that men are inherently free and that governments should serve men by ensuring that freedom, rather than being served by people who were essentially slaves to the authority.

What a brilliant concept!

In developing the structure of government, they placed limits on it while leaving citizens with the power and authority. They studied the histories and did their best to address deficits that led other governments to their downfall. They considered future needs (the amendment process) and thought through the way things would work. They anticipated consequences and posed - and answered - questions about how things should be conducted and 'what if...' scenarios.

In thinking about all of this, I couldn't help but wonder if we have that capacity today? Sadly, I do not think so.

Too many of our elected representatives are interested only in catering to the special interests that put them in the position in the first place. We have politicians at all levels refer to 'working families' which we all know is code for 'union.' They emphasize that their votes/actions are for the 'working families.' But they are not elected to represent only a specific portion of our population; they are supposed to be doing what is in the best interest of ALL!

In the last 90 years, we've expanded our federal government beyond all imagination of our founders. Government rules us - through regulations and codes and laws - even to the point where we cannot possibly understand it all and often have to consult 'experts' (accountants, attorneys, specialists) to help us know what it is we're supposed to do to be in compliance.

Government tells us what kind of car we can buy, what kind of light bulb we can use, how much water our toilets can process, what information must be present on our food packaging, what kind of bag to use at the grocery store, what kind of fence we can put up, what kind of dock we can build on our waterfronts (if we can even build one at all!), what the volume level of our commercials on TV can be, and on and on and on.

WSPD's afternoon show host Brian Wilson regularly offers a prize to the person who can name the one thing that government doesn't regulate, control, tax, etc... As far as I know, it's a trick question: there isn't anything.

With this type of government today, is it any surprise that I'm so pessimistic about the ability to find an honest man who could engage upon the task our founders faced?

Some people, recognizing that government is so out of control, have suggested a Constitutional Convention. I wholeheartedly reject that idea - out of fear that what we'd end up with would be so distant in scope and meaning from the one we currently have that, when completed, we'd be slaves by Constitution, rather than just by recent practice.

And then I look at the people who comprise this great nation. Yes, there are lots of good, honest people. But do they have the training and capacity to ask the right questions in order to obtain the right answers? I don't think there are as many as most of us would like.

Throughout my political career, I was often told (by supporters and opponents alike) that I asked good questions. I attribute that to my excellent training in college from men like Bill Rosenberg (retired managing editor of The Blade and my advisor on The Collegian newspaper) and William Day (former Blade editor and one of my professors and informal adviser - he recommended me for my Dow Jones Newspaper Fund internship), who taught me the value of not only asking the right question, but knowing what the answer should be.

It was training that served me well, but it still strikes me how often others didn't seem to think about issues and next steps and 'what ifs' in order to come up with similar questions on their own. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying I'm smarter than everyone else - just trained in a different manner.

But if that was my experience in elective office, how much more so is it a problem among the general populace, with today's failed public education system and especially in an age where American Idol gets more participation than an election and everyone expects problems to be solved in 30 minutes like in a sitcom?

Where would we find individuals capable of acting like our founders? And could we be sure that they wouldn't succumb to the pressures of lobbyists and special interests and various groups and agents?

Are we, like King Richard, facing our doom, willing to trade everything for an honest man who would abide by the Constitution and not seek to expand government into a slave master? Or one who would begin to repeal the damage done over the past several decades?

Thinking about this makes me very sad about what our nation has become. And I wonder if we're not witnessing the beginning of our end.


For more on this subject, I recommend the following links:

Leslie Carbone's "Constitutional Limits"
Bill Collier's "Freedom Faces A Progressive Assault"
Skip Murphy's "Is there an honest man - even one?" and "Given no honest men - 'what do we do'?"
Dr. Bill Smith's "Constitutional Convention - Not A Good Idea!"

Conservatives are more honest than liberals

I'm always amused by the various polls and conclusions about Conservatives and Liberals. You know the ones I'm talking about - conservatives are more generous, liberals are smarter, conservatives are happier, etc...

Well, here's another one to add to the list, Conservatives are more honest than Liberals, from author Peter Schweizer (“Makers and Takers: Why Conservatives Work Harder, Feel Happier, Have Closer Families, Take Fewer Drugs, Give More Generously, Value Honesty More, Are Less Materialistic and Envious, Whine Less ... And Even Hug Their Children More Than Liberals”):

Yet there is a striking gap between the manner in which liberals and conservatives address the issue of honesty.

Consider these results:

Is it OK to cheat on your taxes? A total of 57 percent of those who described themselves as “very liberal” said yes in response to the World Values Survey, compared with only 20 percent of those who are “very conservative.” When Pew Research asked whether it was “morally wrong” to cheat Uncle Sam, 86 percent of conservatives agreed, compared with only 68 percent of liberals.

Ponder this scenario, offered by the National Cultural Values Survey: “You lose your job. Your friend’s company is looking for someone to do temporary work. They are willing to pay the person in cash to avoid taxes and allow the person to still collect unemployment. What would you do?”

Almost half, or 49 percent, of self-described progressives would go along with the scheme, but only 21 percent of conservatives said they would.

When the World Values Survey asked a similar question, the results were largely the same: Those who were very liberal were much more likely to say it was all right to get welfare benefits you didn’t deserve.

The World Values Survey found that those on the left were also much more likely to say it is OK to buy goods that you know are stolen. Studies have also found that those on the left were more likely to say it was OK to drink a can of soda in a store without paying for it and to avoid the truth while negotiating the price of a car.

Another survey by Barna Research found that political liberals were two and a half times more likely to say that they illegally download or trade music for free on the Internet.

A study by professors published in the American Taxation Association’s Journal of Legal Tax Research found conservative students took the issue of accounting scandals and tax evasion more seriously than their fellow liberal students. Those with a “liberal outlook” who “reject the idea of absolute truth” were more accepting of cheating at school, according to another study, involving 291 students and published in the Journal of Education for Business.

A study in the Journal of Business Ethics involving 392 college students found that stronger beliefs toward “conservatism” translated into “higher levels of ethical values.” And academics concluded in the Journal of Psychology that there was a link between “political liberalism” and “lying in your own self-interest,” based on a study involving 156 adults.

Liberals were more willing to “let others take the blame” for their own ethical lapses, “copy a published article” and pass it off as their own, and were more accepting of “cheating on an exam,” according to still another study in the Journal of Business Ethics.

Now, I’m not suggesting that all conservatives are honest and all liberals are untrustworthy. But clearly a gap exists in the data. Why?

He speculates about a possible explanation for the poll results:

The honesty gap is also not a result of “bad people” becoming liberals and “good people” becoming conservatives. In my mind, a more likely explanation is bad ideas. Modern liberalism is infused with idea that truth is relative. Surveys consistently show this. And if truth is relative, it also must follow that honesty is subjective.

He may have a point.