Monday, July 30, 2012
Marcy Kaptur owes us an explanation for voting against an audit of the Federal Reserve
I rarely agree with Marcy Kaptur. She first appeared on the ballot the first year I was able to vote and she's been my representative in Congress for all of my adult life.
She's a Democrat - and one of the most liberal ones - so it's no surprise that I disagree with her positions, policies and votes.
But I agreed with her support of a bill to audit the Federal Reserve. She co-sponsored legislation in 2009 to authorize an audit, though that bill was never brought before the House for a vote.
So it was a welcome relief when she co-sponsored H.R. 459 - a bill to 'audit the Fed' - that is essentially the same as the 2009 bill.
Last week, the House voted on H.R. 459 and it passed by a vote of 327-98. The 98 against the bill included one Republican and 97 Democrats.
Imagine my surprise when I learned that Kaptur - a sponsor - voted AGAINST the bill.
She's railed against the lack of transparency and the collusion of the Federal Reserve with the 'evil banksters' for years now. Why in the world would she vote against a bill she's supported for at least three years?!?
She wasn't alone - seven other Democrats, also sponsors, voted no as well. Dennis Kucinich, the primary opponent she defeated, remained consistent and supported the bill. I can only wonder what his supporters will say about this.
None of the eight flip-floppers have provided a statement.
Regardless of our political affiliation, one thing constituents should be able to count on is consistency in the positions of those we elect - even when we disagree.
Marcy Kaptur owes all of us an explanation and we should demand it now.
Here is a link to her contact page. Her Washington telephone number is (202) 225-4146. Her Toledo telephone number is (419) 259-7500. She also has a toll-free number (800) 964-4699.
If you find out why she flipped on this issue, be sure to let us know.
Labels:
audit,
Federal Reserve,
flip-flop,
Marcy Kaptur,
Ron Paul
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment